In 2016, how did the Christianity Stack Exchange fare? Are there any interesting trends or content worth sharing?
1 Answer
Trends
Overall site activity has declined somewhat since 2015. We can see this through a few different metrics: traffic, new users, new content, and vote count.
Traffic
We've seen modest declines, around 12%, in visits, according to Quantcast:
US Rest of the world Total
2015 5.6M 2.8M 8.4M
2016 4.8M 2.5M 7.4M
%chg –14% –11% –12%
New users
Similarly, the number of new users by quarter (min. 2 rep) shows some decline as well, even accounting for seasonal differences:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2015 415 350 346 320
2016 341 288 273 231
%chg –18% –18% –21% –28%
Some of the greater decline in the last couple quarters might be attributable to these new users not having the benefit of time to gain upvotes.
New content
We've seen a moderate decline in questions asked and a larger one in answers given:
Questions Answers Total
2015 1351 3399 4750
2016 1181 2211 3392
%chg –13% –35% –29%
Votes
The number of upvotes and downvotes has also declined:
Upvotes Downvotes Total
2015 22831 10345 33176
2016 17479 7012 24491
%chg –23% –32% –26%
Given the decline in new content, it's perhaps unsurprising that the number of votes has fallen as well. That said, we might expect the increasing size of the repository to attract more votes from new users.
Content and users
On a happier note, we've seen many examples of generous users and highly voted content.
Generosity
- Simply a Christian gave away the most reputation in bounties this year
- curiousdannii had the highest Votes to Reputation ratio among qualified users (0.78). Runners up were bruised reed (0.63) and KorvinStarmast (0.56).
- These users had at least 500 votes and 500 reputation earned in 2016. Among those just missing these minimums, the highest ratio belongs to Thunderforge, at 0.99.
- This metric indicates dedication to the community (via one of its most important mechanisms, voting) with relatively little reward in reputation.
Top New Questions and Answers
Top 10 questions of 2016 by score:
- According to those holding that Lazarus was literally raised from the dead, why did Matthew, Mark, and Luke not mention it?
- Why are psalms in the bible printed with funny spacing?
- Why does the Salvation Army not administer the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Supper?
- Why did John Newton oppose Handel's Messiah?
- What is the basis for forbidding prerecorded music in worship services?
- What is the earliest use of the phrase “God the Son”?
- Did Tertullian forbid Christians from being school teachers?
- What does the abbreviation “RNIO” mean in a painting of the Virgin and Child?
- When is the first time in church history we find a prayer ending with “in Jesus' name, amen”?
- Who first described Pentecost as a reversal of Babel?
Several of the top 10 answers of 2016 appear as answers to one of the above questions. Those that do not are listed separately here:
- Is there more than one Joseph in the Bible?
- Which tribe did Paul belong to?
- Would reading “The Street Bible” help me understand the KJV Bible?
- What is the Biblical basis for using the names “Yeshua” and “Yehoshua” (Joshua) for Jesus?
- Can any sin be forgiven? (According to the teaching of the Catholic Church)
- Has a parable originally used by Jesus been left out of Luke 14? [closed]
And finally, here are the top 6 unanswered questions of 2016, by score:
- Why did the Presbyterian Church of Korea split in 1959?
- Why Was Jesus Represented as Being Born in a Cave?
- What's the source of the “new world religion” memorandum signed in Strasbourg?
- Is there a recognised soteriology that combines selective election for some and general election for everyone else?
- Are the five propositions condemned by Cum occasione in the Augustinus?
- Why does the Roman Catholic Church not hold to the perspicuity of Scripture?
Summary
This cursory review reveals moderate declines in key metrics like traffic, content, and community involvement (via vote count). Even so, we have numerous examples of dedicated community members, including many who give (via voting) more than they receive (in reputation). We also have seen a wide variety of highly regarded content, both questions and answers.
Now let's make 2017 even better!
-
4I'm going to look into this more, but for now a word of caution: I don't think the "decline" you're seeing is necessarily indicative of anything. At the very beginning of the year there was a huge shake up in the search engine world and we lost a ton of traffic overnight due to not showing up the same way as before. I'm pretty sure we've been steadily growing through 2016, but the baseline new visitor traffic got moved right after the first of the year — something that really doesn't reflect on the health of the site as much as a first blush might suggest.– Caleb ModCommented Jan 1, 2017 at 6:18
-
2Thanks @Caleb. I didn't feel qualified to provide much analysis on the data I found, but something like what you are talking about certainly makes sense. And even if there is a true "decline," that's not necessarily a bad thing either -- it might indicate higher quality standards and a focusing of our niche. Commented Jan 1, 2017 at 12:32
-
1Pageview traffic took a massive hit virtually overnight in the last 2 weeks of December last year to the tune of 30% or so of new visitor traffic. I haven't found a source but I remember SE at the time letting us know it was a change in Google page rank calculations that took this chunk. After that the next few months have a lot of jitter, but the trend since July is up again. So the 10–15% loss you show for the year is actually a 15–20% gain over the year if you figure the December 2015 "reset" as the year starting point.– Caleb ModCommented Jan 1, 2017 at 21:58
-
4That being said the contribution activity numbers you're looking at (posts, votes) seem to line up pretty well with what I have access to. I'd say the vote number at least is cause for concern. We might want to try to get the "vote early vote often" mantra in front of some of our newer site visitors. The more votes flow the more effective the crowd sorting mechanism becomes and the more motivated people are to keep contributing.– Caleb ModCommented Jan 1, 2017 at 22:01