Timeline for Christianity Self-Evaluation: Let's Get Critical! [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 17, 2012 at 20:03 | history | edited | AarthiStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1172 characters in body
|
Sep 11, 2012 at 18:48 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
Sep 8, 2012 at 17:58 | history | closed | AarthiStaff | too localized | |
Sep 8, 2012 at 17:58 | comment | added | Aarthi Staff | Thanks for all your help, everyone! :) I'll do my best to get our results back to you guys asap. | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 14:29 | comment | added | user23 | @Aarthi Awesome, thanks! | |
Sep 6, 2012 at 5:25 | comment | added | Aarthi Staff | @JustinY Oh! Well, in general, we want you all to learn from these, as they're kind of for you all to see any "weak spots" on your own. That said, I'm happy to relay the team feedback for you guys. I usually only do this for the first one, but since y'all didn't get any info back from your first one, I'll rectify that. | |
Sep 2, 2012 at 15:53 | comment | added | Mike | I think there is some value in trying to asses the quality of questions and answers. However, it should be recognized up front that in religion a good answer can't be determined objectively through a given set of rules, or through democratic voting. Only by faith can a good answer be perceived. A good answer always has some degree of preaching in it, for truth calls for moral decision. Taking the implicit preaching out it ruins its moral value. Good answers often causes controversy and division. Personally, I think my best questions & answers have received the lower up-votes. | |
Sep 1, 2012 at 16:31 | comment | added | user23 | This is the third time we've done this. Are we ever going to be told what the results are? Or perhaps even why we keep doing this? | |
Aug 30, 2012 at 0:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/240962480065626112 | ||
Aug 29, 2012 at 20:52 | comment | added | Bruce Alderman | The one thing that bothers me is that most of these questions have only one answer. Surely no answer is so comprehensive that nobody else has anything to add. | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 19:39 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | I gotta say, I'm pleased with the quality of posts this time around. Perhaps its the luck of the draw, but this was much better than I expected. | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:29 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 7 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:29 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 2 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 6 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:28 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 7 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:27 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 7 | |
Aug 29, 2012 at 16:27 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: 4 | |
S Aug 29, 2012 at 16:27 | answer | added | AarthiStaff | timeline score: -2 | |
S Aug 29, 2012 at 16:27 | history | asked | AarthiStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |