Timeline for Is there a good reason infant baptism shouldn't have its own tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 at 18:38 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | Searching for "infants" + "baptism" would find inappropriate questions like "Why do [denomination] forbid infants attending adult baptism ceremonies?". So I'd say that a single "infant-baptism" (or "baptism-infants" or whatever) tag would be appropriate. I suspect that such a change might even make the "infant" tag no longer needed. I also suspect than many people won't know to use the word "paedobaptism". | |
| Jan 3, 2019 at 22:21 | history | edited | curiousdanniiMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2019 at 20:52 | answer | added | Peter TurnerMod | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jan 3, 2019 at 11:50 | history | edited | curiousdanniiMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 92 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2019 at 11:45 | answer | added | CalebMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 3, 2019 at 11:41 | history | asked | curiousdanniiMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |