Timeline for 2013 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 25, 2013 at 12:04 | comment | added | The Freemason | @DavidStratton I too think he would do a good job. I look forward to a regime change - I hope that some new people get a shot at being a mod. It will be a good way to grow the community instead of the same people doing the same thing - even if it's just one new person. | |
| Jul 25, 2013 at 4:13 | comment | added | David Stratton | @DanAndrews I saw that... I hope it didn't appear I was picking on svidgen. I'm actually quite glad he's running and I think he'd make a good mod. I was just asking for clarification. "close" isn't a bad answer, I was basically wondering if the mod hammer made a difference to svidgen. Wax already shows restraint because of his mod hammer, so I didn't ask him. I thought svidgen's reply here was good. | |
| Jul 24, 2013 at 13:45 | comment | added | svidgen | @AffableGeek If my profile picture is accurate, it's slightly smaller. | |
| Jul 24, 2013 at 12:49 | comment | added | Affable Geek | Is your foot bigger than, or smaller than, my house? | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 16:21 | comment | added | The Freemason | @DavidStratton Wax also has "close" for #3. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:57 | history | edited | CalebMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix bullets so the aren't code blocks
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:49 | history | edited | CalebMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed list numbering
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 2:45 | comment | added | David Stratton | Fair answer, thanks! | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 2:41 | comment | added | svidgen | Well, my assumption is that the type of question in #3 needs to be changed significantly to be site-relevant and/or draw in relevant answers. With the new "oh hold" message in place of the "closed" message, I think it communicates precisely what it would need to in this case. And it would prevent answers, fit for the site or not, from piling up on a question that may soon be edited to make those answers irrelevant to the question. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 2:37 | comment | added | David Stratton | That is true, exactly as it would be if several of us ordinary members voted to close. the main difference for a mod is what @Caleb calls the "mod hammer". A single vote from a mod can put the question "on hold" unilaterally. this holds regardless of reason - duplicate, opinion-based, etc. example | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 1:26 | comment | added | svidgen | @DavidStratton I was under the impression that it put it into an "on hold" state for N days. Is that not true? | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 0:10 | comment | added | David Stratton | On the close/hold option, you realize that as a moderator, there's a difference, and your single close vote automatically, categorically closes the question with a single vote. With that in mind, is the close/hold your first tool on question 3? | |
| Jul 22, 2013 at 21:47 | history | edited | svidgen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 402 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2013 at 21:23 | history | edited | svidgen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 279 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2013 at 21:18 | history | answered | svidgen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |