Timeline for How can I write my answers objectively and in compliance with the site purpose?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 1:39 | history | edited | Lee Woofenden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor typo and wording fixes
|
| Jan 26, 2013 at 5:37 | comment | added | svidgen | @DavidStratton Perhaps wikipedia could be an acceptable research starting point. Find a good article, check the references, etc. Could you edit your other suggestion into this answer? | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 4:28 | comment | added | David Stratton | I agree with everything here except recommending using Wikipedia. I know it's usually pretty reliable, but historically, it's been frowned upon a s a source. On the other hand, it's darn hard to find any other source that's close to being as neutral. I'd play it safe and never answer from a "Christianity teaches" and instead go for the top 3 views. Example: christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/12511/… | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:39 | comment | added | svidgen | OK ... I simply removed the last bullet. I think it's redundant and/or implied anyway in the way that I meant it. | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:39 | history | edited | svidgen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 143 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:36 | comment | added | svidgen | @PeterTurner Noted. I intended that to be meant a different way than it was interpretable, I think. I'll edit it. | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:33 | comment | added | Peter Turner Mod | I'm not so sure if "Catholics Believe" is always the right thing to say. I asked a priest (who you may know) about participation on this site and he said it's usually better to answer questions by saying "I think" if you've got any doubt. I don't think people should avoid answer questions just because they're not wholly confident they've got the right answers. | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:23 | comment | added | svidgen | If you like ... say, >= 75% of what's here, please edit this post rather than submit your own answer. Please add or clarify bullet-points when possible, rather than adding bullets. And, please combine bullet-points and/or remove redundant points when possible. I'd ideally like a single list that easily fits in a single, average, laptop-sized screen to direct answerers to when they get ... excited. | |
| Jan 26, 2013 at 3:19 | history | answered | svidgen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |