I propose establishing orthodox as a synonym for eastern-orthodox, which can be voted for (or against) here.
I would propose removing the greek-orthodox tag and placing the four (4) posts tagged this way under the eastern-orthodox tag. Otherwise this opens up the possibility of separate tags for every national jurisdiction of Eastern Orthodoxy (one for ...
This isn't really an answer, but a comment that's too long for a comment.
I think the key thing to remember when discussing these tags is that we are not defining, nor defending doctrine. We are using language to talk about complex concepts about which there are many opinions.
Acknowledging that there is a word "marriage" which can mean to some, "one man, ...
I think Biblical-Basis should stand on its own.
(Correct me if I'm wrong here.)
From what I understand, the issue of looking for something from a denominational perspective stems from the fact that we must, absolutely, keep the questions answerable, objectively, and definitively. We do not want our answers to devolve into a war of opinions where the most ...
Synonym proposal: augustine (7 questions), st-augustine-of-hippo (2 questions), augustine-of-hippo (2 questions).
Based on the question count, augustine seems a good candidate for the authoritative name.
(wax eagle caught the first tag; I did not notice that duplicate when browsing tags.)
Yes. It is useless.
The typical path for tag removal is to edit it out of each question it is on and then have SEI blacklist the tag (or just keep editing it out, depending on severity and recurrence)
Let's take care if we do remove it to do it slowly as not to overwhelm the front page.
My vote goes to "No way!".
If a question asks in the title:
"Does the wine and wafer truly become the blood and body of Christ"
and the body of the question asks,
Is it true that the wine and wafer in holy Communion actually become
the body of Christ?
It's a Truth question.
Adding "Catholicism" to the tag is absolutely not sufficient to turn it ...
Branded Tags are branded by advertising agreement with the companies doing the branding.
SE has not put much effort (any that I'm aware of) into monetizing any sites except for the main three sites (SO/SU/SF and maybe a bit on gaming, though it's been a while since they've even done a big promo there), largely because they are committed to ...
There is no problem with virgin-mary referring to the Mother of Christ, and the tag does not necessarily immediately call the doctrine of her perpetual virginity to the mind of a Protestant. Even in Protestant churches, it is common to hear "the Virgin Mary," referring to her throughout her life because of her state at the birth of Christ, regardless of her ...
meh - I think the existing tags got the job done for that one. And applying "church history" to modern church history is entirely legit in my view. There are actually tags already for ecumenical-council and schism believe it or not.
This isn't really a suggestion for action, but a survey of the current situation.
A quick glance at the christian-identity questions suggests to me that the questions fall into three general categories:
Questions where the tag could simply be removed without any damage to the question. Examples:
Why didn't God remove the rainbow?
My test is simple:
If a question is asking about a single verse with enough information to identify it, it should be allowed (but not encouraged per se). If we are going to allow "simple questions" in other areas, I don't think verse search should be an exception. At minimum, if people really don't like these, they should be closed as "too basic" or "no ...
I respectfully disagree with Fredsbend.
There is a massive difference between what this community regards as 'a truth question' and an on-topic question regarding a denominational or doctrinal perspective on 'truth'. In my view, it is entirely legitimate to have the 'truth' tag for the purpose of the latter.
What is the biblical support that the ...
You can find out what any of the tags means by clicking on "tags" in the top navigation bar and searching for it.
None of the tags are capitalized. It's a StackExchange convention.
In this case, the Acts tag refers to:
The fifth book of the New Testament, giving an account of the lives of
the apostles after Jesus' death and resurrection, and the ...
As far as I can figure, pretty much any time there would be a meaningful distinction to be made between the two it's reasonable to expect the question and answers to specifically delineate their own scope—as far as a general taxonomy of topics go I don't see a problem with them being lumped together.
If there was a substantial amount of expertise that ...
I'm not entirely convinced this is a good idea. I upvoted the question because at first bluff I agreed that the term isn't technically quite accurate in describing the range of things that fit under it here. However I'm concerned that we'll lose out on some factors if we rename it. ‘Biblical Basis’ is a bit of a buzz-word that has momentum outside of this ...
I think the limitation here is how many questions must be tagged something before the tag will survive. There is a garbage collection routine of sorts that removes tags that only appear in X (1?) questions.
I would say that for any Saint that has more than one question to their name, go for it, but leave some sort of broader tag for "saints" so that it is ...
Divisions of Christianity should be our primary tags.
I've been using David Stratton's excellent answer as a touchstone when reading questions on the site. If you buy into the philosophy that we are looking down at Christianity rather than up for Truth, the largest regions of our map should be the three major traditions:
No, they should not be synonyms. I agree with your distinction:
One might argue that early-church refers more to the practice and history of the early church, while church-fathers refers more to the actual men and their writings.
Then you posit that "basically everything" we know about the early church is because of what the church fathers wrote. Though ...
There are two translation questions that might not fit into bible-translation. One is about the Book of Mormon and the other is about the Nicene Creed.
If bible is a useful tag, we should set up a synonym:
bible-translation => translation
Then it will be possible to ask translation questions about other texts or questions tagged translation and bible.
I'm convinced that the only questions in this list that should be tagged jesus are the ones about the life of Jesus. And these could easily be retagged to jesus-of-nazareth. We can move the other questions to better tags.
jesus-of-nazareth or if we keep jesus these should be the only questions it remains on
messiah possibly along with prophecy ...
I agree in principle, but I think it may be a bit more difficult than it sounds.
Unlike Catholicism, LDS, and Jehovah's Witnesses, many "faith traditions" do not have a single right answer. For example, it can be difficult to give a single, correct answer to "what do Baptists teach about x?" Baptists are technically not a denomination but are a group/...
Tags are not created on their own, they are added to questions on an as needed basis. We cannot create tags except by placing them on appropriate questions. In order to add tags, a question must first be asked and then somebody with enough reputation points can add the tag. In fact with just s couple hundred points you will be able to create them yourself. ...
I rise to speak in defense of the biblical-basis tag. I love those questions, and I find them to be the most valuable for me.
Historically, "Scripture" has been the first of the "sources of theology," and from my evangelical background, the most important. Likewise, when I do theology, while I may find it interesting what certain denominations hold, it is ...
Actually both tags already existed so I'm not sure why you chose to tag your question with the variant you say here (and I agree) is not as optimal. I have retagged your question and the other two on the site that used heretic with heresy. I also merged the plural version into the main one. As long as no questions pop up using the wrong tags in a couple days ...
See this Meta Stack Exchange discussion
While you can quote Wikipedia in tag wikis (but not excerpts) as long as you attribute it correctly, it's generally discouraged.
If you're asking about making the tag wiki be little more than just a link to Wikipedia, then don't do that. They should be useful and informative by themselves.
I suggest christian-identification for questions regarding how some groups identify and define Christianity.
I suggest christian-identity-movement for questions regarding that theology/ideology.
I suggest identity-christianity as a synonym for christian-identity-movement.
I approved your recent edits to the tag wikis and excerpts because they were a step ...
verse-identification is a cancer and should not be allowed to metastasize. Other sites have struggled with similar tags with poor results. Gaming has disallowed the similar game-id tag, and SFF routinely has arguments over their story-id tag.
Here's the thing, Google is already super good at this kind of thing. You type in a few words about a topic, and it ...