2 of 4
added 135 characters in body
Double U
  • 6.8k
  • 10
  • 13

What happens if your academic sources seem as though they tackle a "truth-seeking" question?

I want to use the following source for a question.

Liu, Q. (2007). ON A PARADOX OF CHRISTIAN LOVE. Journal Of Religious Ethics, 35(4), 681-694. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00326.x

The author compares and contrasts loving God and loving his or her neighbor. Although the two greatest commands have inspired Christians to do many humanitarian acts for Christians and non-Christians alike, the author argues that they may also pose a paradox, because, he argues, only by loving God at greater importance than loving the neighbor can allow the Christian to successfully distinguish neighborly love from other (non-Christian) religions). Therefore, I think the source would be adequate enough to be used as support for a particular question, because that question asks when would it be appropriate for the Christian to hate a person.

Although the question may sound like a truth-seeking question, I think it can be answered with proper academic sources.

Broadly speaking, is this website exclusively limited to denominational opinions, or are some academics' opinions allowed to enter?

Double U
  • 6.8k
  • 10
  • 13