I posted a question which understandably attracted "hold" vote for either too broad, attracted "listy" answer, or too TL;DR. I'm new to posting questions to this site, and I'm asking long time members & moderators here on how I can form better questions that add value to the site as well as serving my own need :-).
I have modified the question (now at rev #13) based on the input provided by curiousdannii, Ken Graham, Peter Turner (thank you!). But to protect the integrity of the question, it remains necessarily long and the answer demanded will likely be still complex. So I specifically requested for an annotated bibliography format, which I used to see in entries such as the scholarly IVP Dictionary series (see sample pages there).
My question at this meta site is therefore:
- Is the topic of my question suitable?
- Does the question (as of rev 13) already have the right form?
- Can I expect an answer in the form of annotated bibliography list? (of course I don't expect the scholarly level of IVP Dictionaries, but simply the format)