We have but one tag. This tag is currently being reviewed to clarify its use and intent. The purpose of this qustion (which is related), is to ascertain whether we need a second tag (which kinda depends on what we do with the linked meta discussion).

Proposal: Should we create an tag, which would be a tag for questions about apologetics, meaning they are questions about what Apologetics is, how apologetic arguments are developed, what makes a good apologist. In other words, the tag would refer to the study, field, or process of Apologetics.

Contrast this with the existing tag, which would be a tag identifying a question as needing assistance developing a specific apologist argument.

1 Answer 1


I don't really think two tags are needed, but if the site community thinks two are warranted then I think it should be the other way round - should be about the field as a whole, and a new tag, perhaps should be about particular apologetic arguments, whether ones the OP knows about, or questions asking for help developing them.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .