It is not a Christianity SE answer, it is my own opinion (having nearly zero experience on this site).
Be careful with the Internet, anybody can say to you anything.
It is not a big problem, if you get, for example, some false information about the taste of the electrons. (It was only an example, I think you've got very high quality answers for your this question!)
Christianity SE, and any internet source, is dangerous if it is only information source.
The site is useful to spread out the Message to the peoples of the Earth. Doing this is our obligation. But that is it!
Never trust only it. Never ask any important here.
Ask your own cleric. Simply go to him, and ask him.
If you don't have one, or won't have a regular contact with a denomination, then use the site - it is better as nothing.
Now about your problem. SE sites tend to have a little continuous... troubles about, what is on-topic and what is not. The original intention of the SE founders was likely to decide these with votes. I would say, it is only a partial result. This leads to fights.
Fights in lesser important things, for example, should X be allowed on Y site, can be fought as usual. Typically, a "central mass" of the long-term and most active meta users and answerers decides. But also ordinary commoners have a little word, particularly if they are enough loud. :-) But as you don't make a heated debate in a temple, even in the (unheard) case that you would have the reason to do it, and so you don't make a heated debate on the CSE, too.
Another thing is that you should get back the same. You don't get it back, the software of the SE engine handled your downvoted or closed question like if you had asked some bad thing in physics. It should not be allowed for a program to decide about Bible questions anything.
This is another reason.
What you can ask from your local presbyter (?), ask him.
Use the CSE as an extension of your ordinary life, not instead it!
If you don't have a regular contact with him, then even the CSE is better as nothing.