Revised to address your edited question...
If you drop the evangelism idea, that removes a lot of my misgivings. Still, there's a time and a place: if I'm trying to make sense of some thorny philosophical issue, then bringing in an outsider's viewpoint can be helpful...
But... No one likes the guy who goes around quoting the C++ FQA on questions from folks who are just trying to solve a problem without abandoning their platform. In the case of the example answer you linked to on lonesomeday's answer, no one was asking about regional legal issues, historical origins of gender roles, or your personal opinion - the question was specifically, explicitly asking for Biblical sources. While you may have had the knowledge to contribute there, your personal point of view likely prevented you from doing so.
My views openly conflict with the majority of the users.
There's a really good chance that, for the majority of users, their views will conflict to some extent with the views of... the majority of users. 'Tis the nature of the topic. If this is gonna work, it'll be by respecting the views of other users even while disagreeing with them, and avoiding the trap of turning every question into a sectarian battlefield.
If you can do the same, and stick to contributing where your knowledge is applicable and on-topic, I don't see any reason why you couldn't survive here.