I have noticed several questions that deal with whether any Christian group allows or does not allow some practice or belief, and that these questions often go unanswered because it is difficult to prove a negative I.e. To definitively say that no group allows or disallows something. Is this considered problematic? My concern is that by not answering due to the phrasing of the question, we are not presenting Christian thought on why something is allowed or not allowed.

  • 1
    please link to specific examples so we have a better idea what you're talking about. Sep 20, 2015 at 16:28
  • 2
    I think this one is the one being referenced here. But here's another one that probably qualifies. Sep 21, 2015 at 0:43
  • I don't have a specific one in mind but will link as I see them come up
    – JAGAnalyst
    Sep 21, 2015 at 0:44

1 Answer 1


Of course, you are right that proving a negative is impossible. However, it's still possible to provide a good answer even when the answer's basic message is, "no, no such thing exists" (replace "thing" with "tradition" or whatever you are looking for). Such answers might:

  1. Demonstrate that an effort was made to find the requested thing
  2. Quote the writings of scholars who write on the subject, particularly those who explicitly or implicitly say that no such thing exists
  3. Describe things that might be expected to be answers, but actually aren't
  4. Describe things that are similar to the thing requested, but aren't quite the same
  5. Provide arguments for why the thing does not exist

Any of these five things by themselves will usually not be a particularly good answer (with the possible exception of #2). But by combining two or more of them, you can end up with an answer that, though it does not prove a negative, often is enough to be helpful to the person asking the question.

For example, this answer only provides #5, so it's not a particularly good answer (and it wouldn't be even if examples hadn't been found by other answerers).

On the other hand, this answer employs #1, #2 (arguably), and several examples of #4. Some might not find it particularly satisfying, but it is nonetheless a helpful answer to the question.

  • Thanks, just trying to better understand how to actually answer questions phrased this way, especially when the question has been edited.
    – JAGAnalyst
    Sep 22, 2015 at 21:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .