5

I asked "Would Christianity (in general) agree with “That which is necessary is moral”? [closed]"

How can I better improve this question? This was well-received in Philosophy SE but not here. Say I ask about Catholic opinion. Will that work?

3
  • 1
    I'm not positive the question is off-topic (and if others voted to reopen I'd join them), but one thing you could definitely do is ask for the Biblical basis for the idea, and separately ask for the Biblical basis against it. – Mr. Bultitude Aug 1 '15 at 16:51
  • 2
    Also, yes, you could ask for the Catholic viewpoint. That would be on-topic for sure. – Mr. Bultitude Aug 1 '15 at 16:51
  • @Mr.Bultitude Thanks! – Red Rackham Aug 8 '15 at 7:01
3

There are two core problems with the question, in my opinion:

  1. It doesn't define a doctrinal scope.

    There are wide-ranging responses to this philosophy (or others like it). As a simple example, let me mention war (as it is naturally a common subject to which this philosophy is applied).

    There are many Christians who subscribe to the Just-war theory (as a subset of "That which is necessary is moral."). There are many other Christians who outright reject war under all circumstances.

    One might make the argument that both groups adhere to the "That which is necessary..." philosophy, but have different definitions of "necessary." And that brings me to my second point...

  2. It's a question of philosophy, which is off-topic.

    It's easy to see how a discussion of this philosophy will quickly turn into a discussion of "how does one define necessary?" Which easily turns the philosophy back on itself, by applying the No true scottsman fallacy.

    Stated another way, it's always possible to define "necessary" to fit your own pre-conception of morality, thus rendering the philosophy meaningless, except perhaps as a means of self-justification.

    So ultimately the answer to the question (regardless of theological background) comes down to a philosophical definition of "what is necessary" (the existing answer addresses this). I believe this makes the question off-topic, unless some specific Christian group has directly addressed this issue, in which case we can answer based on that address, rather than on reasoning. But that leads back to my first point above. :)

2
  • Person 1 seems to be begging the question while Person 2 seems to not be disputing the war is immoral. That is a very strange debate. Anyway thanks – Red Rackham Aug 8 '15 at 7:01
  • 1
    @RedRackham: perhaps the debate isn't a useful illustration of my point. But it boils down to "How do you define 'necessary'?" and it's always possible to define it to fit your own preconception of morality. – Flimzy Aug 8 '15 at 15:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .