This question already has an answer here:
We have an new question about Paul's relation to Jonathan. The OP admits its his own historical theory, uncorroborated by anyone. Thus he's seeking that corroboration here.
It is my own speculation, but someone else may very well have thought of it earlier.
Is this permitted here?
It seems to me in the past we have ruled against such questions, although generally they are questions more along the lines of morality. "I reason that it might be permitted to sleep with my girlfriend because... does any church agree with me?"
Admittedly, this Paul question is demonstrably more constructive than our typical user-created theology questions... But does that change the fundamental nature?