Timeline for Brothers, I must go…
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2019 at 23:45 | comment | added | Andrei Rînea | "SE, I hope your new rules are worth the price you will pay for them." - Yep, they sure will. Just like the case with Target, Gillette and others. | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 15:25 | comment | added | d4c0d312 | @TerryLewis though i totally agree with you, I really hope you/we are wrong | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 13:31 | comment | added | Arioch | Well, for the timely discussion it is not relevant where answer exists somewhere, relevant is where it can be fixed today. Russel's teapot may exists, but if we can not locate it now, nor prove all its orbit is clear today, the discussion becomes pointless. The SO as a platform was born exactly for questions that have objectively true answer here and now. | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 13:24 | comment | added | Terry Lewis | Precision is irrelevant to objectivity. Even the greatest question, "Does God exist?" is either objectively true, or objectively false. The answer may seem a bit more difficult to discover, and may not be knowable with 100% certainty, but it's still objectively true or false. | |
| Oct 1, 2019 at 11:08 | comment | added | Arioch |
This entire platform is based on the assumption that Objective Truth actually exists of course it is (for the context)! The platform built to facilitate civil DEBATE what was it? The platform - SO site - was built to collect Q&A about software programming, where 2+2=4 and objective truth usually does exist and where "questions too broad to have precise (thus, objectively true) answer" were banned as off-topic. Maybe it was stretching this format beyond realms where objective truth exists that was wrong in hindsight...
|
|
| Sep 30, 2019 at 19:07 | history | edited | Terry Lewis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 30, 2019 at 19:02 | history | answered | Terry Lewis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |