Skip to main content
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

They should be accepted in the long run. Of course there is the question of relevancy; if I were to ask about Matthew 1:13, I should have to explain what there is to interpret and what it matters. As for the private beta, I think we should optimally have high-quality questions of many different types. So rather quality than quantity; I think your question is on-topic, so it's very welcome if you put a little effort into it.

I already did ask Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."?Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."? . I thought it makes a relevant, on-topic question. Didn't really think that it even could be off-topic.

They should be accepted in the long run. Of course there is the question of relevancy; if I were to ask about Matthew 1:13, I should have to explain what there is to interpret and what it matters. As for the private beta, I think we should optimally have high-quality questions of many different types. So rather quality than quantity; I think your question is on-topic, so it's very welcome if you put a little effort into it.

I already did ask Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."? . I thought it makes a relevant, on-topic question. Didn't really think that it even could be off-topic.

They should be accepted in the long run. Of course there is the question of relevancy; if I were to ask about Matthew 1:13, I should have to explain what there is to interpret and what it matters. As for the private beta, I think we should optimally have high-quality questions of many different types. So rather quality than quantity; I think your question is on-topic, so it's very welcome if you put a little effort into it.

I already did ask Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."? . I thought it makes a relevant, on-topic question. Didn't really think that it even could be off-topic.

Source Link

They should be accepted in the long run. Of course there is the question of relevancy; if I were to ask about Matthew 1:13, I should have to explain what there is to interpret and what it matters. As for the private beta, I think we should optimally have high-quality questions of many different types. So rather quality than quantity; I think your question is on-topic, so it's very welcome if you put a little effort into it.

I already did ask Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."? . I thought it makes a relevant, on-topic question. Didn't really think that it even could be off-topic.