Skip to main content

Timeline for Proposed FAQ changes

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
Oct 1, 2011 at 15:45 comment added TRiG I think that challenge the validity of any belief system would be better wording than challenge the validity of having a belief system. After all, everyone has a belief system.
Oct 1, 2011 at 12:58 history edited CalebMod CC BY-SA 3.0
added 135 characters in body
Sep 20, 2011 at 14:30 comment added Robert Cartaino Another quick note: Your post hashes out the nitty-gritty, but don't forget to start the actual FAQ welcoming users in an upbeat introduction to what the site is about: "Christianity SE is a site for blah, blah, blah. If your question is about this, that, or other, your question is welcome here!" <-- Then onto your bullet points.
Sep 20, 2011 at 14:24 comment added Robert Cartaino This is much better. It's more concise and on point. I would suggest removing the phrase ...not a place to rag on". "Rag on" is a colloquialism more common to the UK. It may not be easily understood where it is lesser-known, and will likely be seen as quite sexist and offensive in some parts of the US: urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rag&defid=374611
Sep 19, 2011 at 21:36 history edited CalebMod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 195 characters in body
Sep 19, 2011 at 20:54 history edited CalebMod CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Sep 18, 2011 at 23:29 history edited CalebMod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 57 characters in body
Sep 18, 2011 at 22:28 comment added El'endia Starman Mod I like the wording of this much more than my own answer. +1
Sep 18, 2011 at 22:17 history answered CalebMod CC BY-SA 3.0