Timeline for Should these question have a truth tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2015 at 18:34 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 8, 2015 at 7:12 | history | edited | bruised reed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
additional info as per comment suggestion
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 7:02 | comment | added | user3961 | Yes, I think that is much better. Perhaps add it to your answer. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 6:58 | comment | added | bruised reed | @fredsbendtheGrinch good point - "the nature of" is unnecessary and can be removed. Perhaps "beliefs" should be italicized for emphasis if that's possible. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 6:56 | comment | added | user3961 | I think if you click through to the tag wiki, it is clickable, but the popup is not. At least, I've never seen it. I think that's a good excerpt. It's not too philosophical? The "nature of truth" seems to be an inherent philosophical question, not necessarily a religious or Christian one. I think I'm just having trouble seeing a 'type' of question that would use this tag. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 5:09 | comment | added | bruised reed | @fredsbendtheGrinch Perhaps: 'For questions about beliefs regarding the nature of truth (note: questions about what is actually true have been judged to be off-topic - see Meta post: "We can't handle the truth")' The last could be linked if the tag excerpt can handle doing that. | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 4:59 | comment | added | user3961 | So what should the excerpt say? How will that help prevent the misuse of the tag? | |
| Jan 8, 2015 at 4:57 | history | answered | bruised reed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |