Timeline for Verbiage for new "Truth Question" close reason
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 18:24 | comment | added | Flimzy | @curiousdannii: That is more clear, but also much less often asked. Most commonly people ask things like "Is Jesus the son of God?" Not "Is it true that Jesus is the son of God?" So I'm not sure that most newbiews would recognize they are asking "Is X true?" questions.... but maybe it'd work | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 10:17 | comment | added | curiousdannii Mod | "Questions asking whether or not a particular doctrine or belief is true" is a bit better. Perhaps even a "Is X true?" | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 20:10 | history | edited | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2014 at 19:06 | comment | added | Flimzy | I have started a new meta post with the goal of becoming a canonical source of information on how to clean up Truth Questions. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:43 | comment | added | wax eagle Mod | Agreed. We've got some work to do on this. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:40 | comment | added | Flimzy | @waxeagle: That poses the question well, but doesn't provide a very useful/complete answer. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:38 | comment | added | wax eagle Mod | According to whom? might do until we add something more comprehensive | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:37 | comment | added | wax eagle Mod | Yeah, that one is excellent. but I am starting to think (looking around a bit), that we may need a comprehensive Q&A that not only outlines the issues, but also has a section with ideas on how to repair the question. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:35 | comment | added | Flimzy | I personally think this is a great response, but the question is a bit more specific than "Truth Questions"--although the answer is pretty closely relevant anyway. Would it be appropriate to edit the question to encompass all "Truth Questions"? Or we could create a new question, and copy that answer. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:33 | comment | added | Flimzy | Can you provide links to the posts you have in mind? We could always create a new one, too, if necessary. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:22 | comment | added | wax eagle Mod | We really need a link to the proper meta post in the response. I'm not sure which is the best one, David Stratton has a couple of very good posts on the subject and likely using one of his is the best option. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:18 | history | edited | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2014 at 18:10 | history | answered | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |