We’re rewarding the question askers & reputations are being recalculated! Read more.
2 added 113 characters in body
source | link

I usually VTC pretty quickly these days, but for the older questions, I've always left them alone because even though they're off-topic or not constructive by current site definitions, they weren't against site guidelines at the time.

Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong, but I've personally left them alone,thinking they should be grandfathred in. Otherwise we'd be forced to close most of the questions older than 9 months old.

That hasn't been unilateral,however. A month or two ago, I flagged one of my own top voted questions, asking a moderator to delete it because it was so awful I was embarrassed to let it stand.

I've voted to close some of the worst, but there is some value to having them around, for historical value - to show how the site has evolved. Even some of the really bad ones serve as good examples to point to when explaining why the site guidelines exist.

The only danger I see in leaving them open is when newcomers find them and mistake the purpose of this site. But it hasn't seemed like that big an issue to me. So far it's been easy to say "this question was from before we had things figured out."

Personally, I think we should leave them alone, unless they are attracting a lot of attention from new users and are confusing them about the current guidelines, and then close them on a case-by-case basis.

I usually VTC pretty quickly these days, but for the older questions, I've always left them alone because even though they're off-topic or not constructive by current site definitions, they weren't against site guidelines at the time.

Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong, but I've personally left them alone,thinking they should be grandfathred in.

That hasn't been unilateral,however. A month or two ago, I flagged one of my own top voted questions because it was so awful I was embarrassed to let it stand.

I've voted to close some of the worst, but there is some value to having them around, for historical value - to show how the site has evolved. Even some of the really bad ones serve as good examples to point to when explaining why the site guidelines exist.

The only danger I see in leaving them open is when newcomers find them and mistake the purpose of this site. But it hasn't seemed like that big an issue to me. So far it's been easy to say "this question was from before we had things figured out."

Personally, I think we should leave them alone, unless they are attracting a lot of attention from new users and are confusing them about the current guidelines, and then close them on a case-by-case basis.

I usually VTC pretty quickly these days, but for the older questions, I've always left them alone because even though they're off-topic or not constructive by current site definitions, they weren't against site guidelines at the time.

Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong, but I've personally left them alone,thinking they should be grandfathred in. Otherwise we'd be forced to close most of the questions older than 9 months old.

That hasn't been unilateral,however. A month or two ago, I flagged one of my own top voted questions, asking a moderator to delete it because it was so awful I was embarrassed to let it stand.

I've voted to close some of the worst, but there is some value to having them around, for historical value - to show how the site has evolved. Even some of the really bad ones serve as good examples to point to when explaining why the site guidelines exist.

The only danger I see in leaving them open is when newcomers find them and mistake the purpose of this site. But it hasn't seemed like that big an issue to me. So far it's been easy to say "this question was from before we had things figured out."

Personally, I think we should leave them alone, unless they are attracting a lot of attention from new users and are confusing them about the current guidelines, and then close them on a case-by-case basis.

1
source | link

I usually VTC pretty quickly these days, but for the older questions, I've always left them alone because even though they're off-topic or not constructive by current site definitions, they weren't against site guidelines at the time.

Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong, but I've personally left them alone,thinking they should be grandfathred in.

That hasn't been unilateral,however. A month or two ago, I flagged one of my own top voted questions because it was so awful I was embarrassed to let it stand.

I've voted to close some of the worst, but there is some value to having them around, for historical value - to show how the site has evolved. Even some of the really bad ones serve as good examples to point to when explaining why the site guidelines exist.

The only danger I see in leaving them open is when newcomers find them and mistake the purpose of this site. But it hasn't seemed like that big an issue to me. So far it's been easy to say "this question was from before we had things figured out."

Personally, I think we should leave them alone, unless they are attracting a lot of attention from new users and are confusing them about the current guidelines, and then close them on a case-by-case basis.