Timeline for The great Prayer Room experiment
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 8:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Jan 11, 2014 at 23:44 | answer | added | trlkly | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 17, 2013 at 19:13 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | @fredsbend: I've added an answer summarizing activity so far. My conclusion is inconclusive. On the one hand, it doesn't seem to be attracting too much unwanted attention and the junk it has collected is easily cleaned up. On the other hand, I don't know how much value it has added to the site. | |
Jun 17, 2013 at 19:07 | answer | added | Jon Ericson | timeline score: 7 | |
Jun 16, 2013 at 7:12 | comment | added | user3961 | Well, it's been a while. What do you think about this room? | |
Mar 29, 2013 at 4:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/317499649403535360 | ||
Mar 26, 2013 at 23:57 | comment | added | wax eagle Mod | @fredsbend we're not going to get any specific support for this room, and that would include a site specific increase in rep requirement. Any user with rep >=20 on any site on the network has access to the entire chat.se server unless the rooms are private. Private rooms are only for moderation purposes. The third option is to make it a gallery room where only specific people can talk. I feel like that defeats the purpose of the room. | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 21:49 | comment | added | user3961 | What a friend we have in Jesus. | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 21:42 | comment | added | user3961 | Maybe not 1000. Maybe 500 is better. | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 21:41 | answer | added | user3961 | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 21:29 | answer | added | user3961 | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 21:03 | comment | added | user3961 | If it were possible I would like to see a rep requirement higher than 20 to post. I'm thinking like 1000 or so on C.SE. This will keep the new users from another SE site from spamming like a certain person did a few weeks ago. This also ensures that they have experience with C.SE (not just SE in general) and follow the rules well enough. | |
Mar 26, 2013 at 20:37 | history | asked | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |