Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
replaced http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Based on this question: http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/is-methodology-advice-to-pastors-too-subjective-to-deal-with-hereIs methodology advice to pastors too subjective to deal with here?

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

Based on this question: http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/is-methodology-advice-to-pastors-too-subjective-to-deal-with-here

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

Based on this question: Is methodology advice to pastors too subjective to deal with here?

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
Caleb Mod
  • 37.5k
  • 7
  • 46
  • 113

Based on this question: http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/is-methodology-advice-to-pastors-too-subjective-to-deal-with-here

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read "Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

Based on this question: http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/is-methodology-advice-to-pastors-too-subjective-to-deal-with-here

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read "Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

Based on this question: http://meta.christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/is-methodology-advice-to-pastors-too-subjective-to-deal-with-here

there seems to be a consensus that:

  1. Not only are Doctrinal Questions are on topic, but so too are Practical Ones
  2. There is support to model "Subjective" questions the same way that Parent.ing SE does
  3. We need to provide some guidance for "Good Subjective" vs. "Bad Subjective." answers

Of course, for background, you should read Good Subjective, Bad Subjective

The question is, how do we evaluate whether an answer to a practical question is on topic?

edited tags
Link
Caleb Mod
  • 37.5k
  • 7
  • 46
  • 113
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/254191232203509760
Canonizing this with a FAQ tag for things that people should be referred to as representative of community consensus.
Link
Caleb Mod
  • 37.5k
  • 7
  • 46
  • 113
Loading
edited title
Source Link
Affable Geek
  • 64.2k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 50
Loading
added 219 characters in body
Source Link
Affable Geek
  • 64.2k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 50
Loading
Source Link
Affable Geek
  • 64.2k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 50
Loading